-RANXEROX-
Boot Camp Grad
See you in Hell.....
Posts: 1
|
scoring
Aug 10, 2005 10:30:59 GMT -5
Post by -RANXEROX- on Aug 10, 2005 10:30:59 GMT -5
Hello all,
Just sitting reading these posts. - even though the scores look impressive, I'm skeptical for more than one reason. I have to say that after playing in a single round for HOURS, how much time had passed before the screenshot? What about the skill level of your opponents?- lastly, and most notably - percentages i.e. kill to death ratios.
Hate to make an exampleof Tsunami, but 863/411 puts the him at 47.6% - about the same as flipping a coin.
|
|
|
scoring
Aug 10, 2005 21:43:31 GMT -5
Post by §kelito on Aug 10, 2005 21:43:31 GMT -5
Hello all, Just sitting reading these posts. - even though the scores look impressive, I'm skeptical for more than one reason. I have to say that after playing in a single round for HOURS, how much time had passed before the screenshot? What about the skill level of your opponents?- lastly, and most notably - percentages i.e. kill to death ratios. Hate to make an exampleof Tsunami, but 863/411 puts the him at 47.6% - about the same as flipping a coin. Ranxerox, These are all valid points you bring up. All the Leader Board is for, to show "High Kills!" Maybe somewhere down the road we can get more detailed with ratio's and matching like in Xbox Live. Right now it's just something the players who like getting these high kills, something to shoot for. But, your post does bring up a new rule for these posts! Your Kills have to be higher then your deaths to make the leader board. Only sounds fair...
|
|